Secular Humanism CelticBear’s Musings

"Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, this would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it." -John Adam, 1756"Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, this would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it." -John Adam, 1756
1st Novel Progress
Words
39k
Goal
95k

Declaration of Independence–good against Kings and Presidents named George.

Posted by CelticBear on July 3rd, 2008

Ever read the Declaration of Independence? I read the first couple of paragraphs at least twice a year. I’ve read the grievances against King George only a couple of times, and then not lately.

In honor of the coming Independence Day I reread the usual again and then went on to read the rest. I was taken by how similar many of the accusations against King George are with what’s been going on the last seven years under President George. Below is the text of the Declaration. Read it all; it’s not long. But I’ve also boldfaced what I found to be very interesting sections and then added my own observations regarding Prez George’s version of these crimes (in blockquotes).

Not that this is an exhaustive list; George  in guilty of quite a lot more than what’s here. Heck, it took Representative Kucinich five hours to read his 35 articles of impeachment against the man!

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

[He and Cheney have called secret policy meetings, closed to public scrutiny using "Executive Privilege"--policy meetings which involve corporate representatives for industry that would later benefit from the policies decided in these meetings without representation or voice of the people.]

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

[He and his administration have fired district prosecutor based on political affiliation and their unwillingness to participate in politically motivated prosecutions.]

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

[Has created a Department of Homeland Security which has collected intelligence, executive, and judicial powers and uses its powers and reach to harass citizens often for political reasons and against those expressing dissent and criticism of his administration.]

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

[Has used the services of private military organizations in operations both foreign and domestic, often as officers of the peace and in use of interrogations, without congressional consent nor oversight.]

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

[He has revoked the Constitutional prohibition on federal military forces being employed in domestic purposes.]

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

[For protecting private military contractors for any crimes and murders committed in these States and overseas in the service of America.]

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

[For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury.]

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

[For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences, and interrogated and tortured by foreign persons on their soil at the behest of his Office.]

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

[For creating White House directives which place all governmental (judicial and legislative) and military power in the hands of his office in the case of arbitrary and non-defined instances of "national emergency."]

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

[He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has conspired with willing and cynical intent to manipulate and manufacture reasons and causes for using America's armed forces in foreign wars for political, corporate, and empirical purposes.]

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

[He has avoided all attempts for petitions of redress by making unparallelled use of "Executive Privilege," has prevented those in his employee acting as representatives of his Office from testifying in front of Congress even after being subpoenaed, has contrived political conditions which has made him immune from being subject to the Constitutional privilege of impeachment for his many high crimes and misdemeanors.]

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Posted in PERSONAL, POLITICS | No Comments »

Welcome to Amerika, please give us all your most private information.

Posted by CelticBear on July 3rd, 2008

More justification as to why foreign travel agents are advertising as a feature trips that don’t touch U.S. soil:

U.S. Courts have ruled, as recently as this spring in a case stemming from a search at LAX, that there’s no need for warrants or suspicions when a person is seeking to enter the country because any “routine search” is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. In effect, it’s like luggage: anything and everything in your laptop, cellphone, BlackBerry or digital camera can be examined and copied by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents.

So far, the agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, has been vague about when and why it conducts those digital searches, how long it keeps the information and what is done with it.

Hope you don’t keep passwords and information about your children on your laptop or have taken any “interesting” vacation photos on your digital camera. Once you hand your devices over to security to be copied and viewd by who knows who, it’s out of your control.

But it’s OK, the government can be trusted with your data!

So, feel safe and secure! Big brother government is without error. Turn over all your private information to their trusting and loving hands.

See previous: On the issue of privacy and protecting civil liberties. and Trusting those with power; police state.

Posted in POLITICS, SOCIAL and NEWS | No Comments »

Trusting those with power; police state.

Posted by CelticBear on July 1st, 2008

As an update to my recent post, On the issue of privacy and protecting civil liberties, I added a story about Local councils in the UK use CCTVs to spy on dog owners’ cute butts; here’s another couple of examples of how reasonable and proper the idea of giving our privacy and liberty over to those error-free and trustworthy persons representing government (note that was irony) :

First, a darkly humorous story:

This is the story of a Missouri town bamboozled into believing an ex-security guard was a federal agent who, thanks to the War on Terrah, was above the law and needed to warrants to search, detain, and arrest suspected drug users and dealers in the town.

Now, this kind of con theoretically can happen most anywhere and regardless of whether it’s post-9/11 or not. But it was likely made all the easier to pull off fooling a mayor, a chief of police, and a police force, and a town thanks to the culture of federal power worship that has been instilled, fostered, and cultivated by the government. We are all being encouraged and convinced, directly and very subtly, to not question authority especially when it’s behind the (supposed) badge of Homeland Security.

A little more serious and far-reaching:

This is that program which I blogged about in Kitchen Fire? Better be a good, upstanding Patriot!, where Homeland Security is forcing government employees, civil workers, like firefighters and EMT’s as well as postmen and utility workers, to keep an eye out for suspicious activity, illegal or legal, outside or inside a home, and report it to a federal database. (Imagine the change in trust in firefighters may be going on when you know that these formally impartial and neutral protectors of public safety are required to start reporting on any “suspicious activity or possessions” they encounter?)

From the previous blog:
–begin quoted section–

But a volunteer firefighter commenting on BoingBoing made this additional, thoughtful observation:

If criminals have to worry that by calling the fire department they are also calling the DHS, they may be less likely to call in the first place, putting lives and property at further risk. If they do call, they may treat firefighters as hostile parties, placing firefighters’ lives at risk beyond the normal hazards of the job.

We’re already well into the world of 1984, this takes us a step closer to Fahrenheit 451. Sweet. Always thought it’d be nice if the world were more like the books I read….

UPDATE: Some of the comments on BoingBoing are good:

I have to agree with Andrew. I’m an EMT in Washington St. We are taught that we are advocates of the patient, so even when I roll up on-scene of a car accident and smell alcohol on the breath of a driver, I’m not allowed to tell the police; only the hospital staff see my report. I know I look around the apartments and houses, but it’s certainly not for DHS or the police.
-tfuller

–end quoted section–

A recent commenter has found and detailed some interesting ways in which this program resembles the East German Stasi’s recruitment of civilian snoops and citizen spies.

Posted in POLITICS, SOCIAL and NEWS | No Comments »

Browne and the Bible.

Posted by CelticBear on July 1st, 2008

I’m mixing the two subjects, Sylvia Browne (and psychics) with Bible criticism…mainly because I have these open links in my browser I want to close. In a way they’re related topics as both deal with credulous thinking.

First, Browne.
Robert Lancaster who runs the site stopsylviabrowne.com (I think he started this after the boy was found alive and “well” (in the captivity of his accoster, years after his abduction) after Sylvia told the hurting and grieving parents, on national television, that he was dead and buried by a rock somewhere…or maybe it was after she told the grieving grandparents of an abducted girl that she was sold into sex slavery and is alive in Japan…when she was actually dead and dumped 13 miles from her grandparent’s home…) went to a Sylvia Browne reading in Vegas last month while he was attending The Amazing Meeting 6. Here is his wonderful and entertaining account of that evening: (It starts a little slow, but boy does it get interesting)

I’ve been reading some of the accounts on the site of the horrid and painful mistakes lies she tells people coming to her for answers about dead or missing loved ones. She is a horrible person, feeding off of pain and suffering for her own fame and fortune. All “psychics” are as they knowingly lie to people who trust them, often causing pain and chaos in their wake (such as the recent case of the psychic instigated investigation of the autistic girl being sexually molested–who wasn’t).

Phil Plait of the BadAstronomer recently recounted his thoughts on a disgustingly credulous Newsweek article about psychics:

The Newsweek article is an embarrassment. It actually says this:
“It’s impossible to objectively judge psychic powers.”
Wow. I mean, wow. Of course it’s objectively possible to judge psychic powers. It’s trivially easy to do so. We have a whole field of mathematics called “statistics”, and it can be used to judge quite well if someone is able to do better than random chance in a fair test.

I have a friend who I recently discovered believes in ghosts, specifically “orbs”. Why? Because of an emotional and personal event involving the death of her mother. She knows I’m a vitriolic skeptic, but when she told me this out of respect to her I remain silent. Some would say I’m doing her no favors about not telling her about the statistical certainty that she should have a coincidental feeling matching her mother’s death, or that memory often and easily confuses imagined feelings after an event with coinciding with an event–and you will believe with utmost certainty of the “truth” of this glitch in memory/emotion. But how do you tell that to someone talking about their mother’s death?! You can’t. I won’t. (I’m pretty certain she doesn’t read this blog). Sometimes it’s better to just shut up and let someone have their belief.

But always in the back of my mind is the nagging guilt that by doing so I’m knowingly allowing them to remain suseptible to people like Sylvia Browne who feed like vampires off the willing belief of trusting people. I feel I’m complicit in the scam, the con, the evil by not providing people, especially friends I care about!, the tools to allow them to think critically and not fall prey to evil assholes like “psychics”.

Now, the Bible.
John W. Loftus has an article today:

I’m familiar with Copeland’s world of merchandise and have seen him on TV a few times, taking the usual cherry-picked positive thinking approach to the Bible. In Loftus’ article he discusses Copeland’s twisted use of “faith” to overcome reasoned thinking and obvious problems with accepting the Bible as a divine relic.

In his article he provides links to some great articles like “The Bible Debunks Itself (Part 1)” (which reminds me of Issac Asimov’s quote: “Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived.” I have to say, my path towards atheism began when I finally, after years of faithful belief, finally read the book that I was professing total faith and belief in.)

Biblical Scholarship and The Lord’s Prayer,” which focuses on the history of the Bible and its very human and mundane although fascinating creation/compilation. Which reminds me of another Asimov quote: “The bible must be seen in a cultural context. It didn’t just happen. These stories are retreads. But, tell a Christian that — No, No! What makes it doubly sad is that they hardly know the book, much less its origins.” (OK, I admit, I didn’t already know that quote like I did the Asimov/atheism quote. I found it while looking for the exact wording of the former. *grin*)

Anyway, just a couple of the great past articles Loftus links to in his latest blog post. Good reading.

Posted in RELIGION, SKEPTICISM | 6 Comments »

Is the beginning of the end in progress?

Posted by CelticBear on June 30th, 2008

I didn’t think they would be crazy enough to do it, but they just may be. When the National Intelligence Estimate came out last December, where a dozen U.S. intelligence agencies agreed that the Iranian nuclear development program has been shut down since 2003, it put a pretty massive roadblock in Bush/Cheney’s increasingly fired-up anti-Iranian rhetoric which was surely leading to open war with the country.

After that assessment came out, I lowered my expectation of war with Iran down to about 20%. Bush seemed appropriately put down by this definitive conclusion from the intelligence community.

But it seems, once again, that intelligence is never an issue in Bush’s decisions.

According to one investigative journalist who has gotten information from Washington insiders, the White House has been escalating covert operations in Iran to spread chaos and disorder with an objective of bringing down Iran’s mythical nuclear program, or instigate war. Because apparently Bush and Cheney “don’t believe” the consensus intelligence assessment. Hey, what’s years worth of data gathering and professional intelligence analysis when you have belief to guide you when leading an empire?!

I guess this really shouldn’t surprise me. When Bush declared the Iranian Revolutionay Guard Corp (part of their regular army) a terrorist organization, he set the stage for open war: Using Patriot Act imposed powers, he can now wage war on the Iranian army without asking for permission from Congress as set down by the Constitution. Although, it appears that even if he asks he’d get permission considering this supposedly new check-and-balance Congress gave Bush $400 million to wage this covert war prep within Iran’s borders.

After having spent all that time selling the US public and the United Nations on war with Iraq over fictional WMD’s, I guess they decided to skip all that and just go to war without bothering to try to convince us they need to.

I’m pretty certain again that before they leave office, King George and Viceroy Cheney will start a war with Iran. Goodness knows Israel and the neo-cons are itching for for one. There’s just the question over what the domestic plan will be:

A) They believe this will bolster McCain’s chances as a war-hero Presidential nominee and he’ll get elected, thus ensuring a virtual 3rd Bush term; or,

B) Using National Security Presidential Directive NSPD-51 / Homeland Security Presidential Directive HSPD-20, Bush will declare a national emergency which will redirect all federal powers to the Executive Branch (him) at which time he will suspend national elections (which he “legally” can do) making him the American dictator (only until such a time as the emergency has ended, I’m sure. Which is what Julius Caesar said, as I recall).

This former is most likely, but the later is possible. If situation B happens, that’s it. You can kiss the United States of America goodbye. It’ll be the end of the empire. The dollar will crash and the euro will take over as the currency of international trade; Russia, China, and very likely a few European nations will turn on us; we’ll suffer from severe embargoes and tariffs at least and military hostility at worst. Internal strife and turmoil will tear the nation up as surely as external pressures. It’s happened before, it’ll likely happen again. The beginnings of the ends of all empires started with the rise of economic woes followed by increased military actions as empty and destructive show of strength and power, which ultimately turn against the empire.

These next several months will determine the fate of the US, I have no doubt. If we can avoid an all-out US/Middle East war and elect a non-war monger for President with a Congress with domestic rebuilding agendas, we can continue as a free nation and maybe become a respected world leader once again. If the World War Bush and Cheney want happens, we’re done for. Simple as that.