
I think you pretty much have to be blind and living in a cave to not see the “style” of leadership from this administration: loyalty above ability. Bush has put oil business friends in his Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, made faithful campaign captains with no experience in charge of FEMA, campaign loyalists with Creationist and climate change denialists in charge of NASA, the family lawyer who got him out of drunk driving charges in the role of the “people’s attorney,” etc ad nauseum.
One can say well, that’s just Bush. All will be better in another year. But will it? Putting aside the Democrats and all their many ills and failings, there has been a huge and dramatic shift in the conservative Republican party and mindset. Before Reagan the Republican party meant small and efficient government–now they want to use government as a means to personal ends regardless of the purpose of government to be the protector of personal liberty and freedom.
Evidence of this? Well, aside from the rampant greed and corruption in the service of personal gain found throughout the Republican party from the top down, from Bush to Tom Delay, here’s the new Republican play-book laid out for us:
♦ Taking Charge of Federal Personnel
The Heritage Foundation is a highly respected (among conservatives) think-tank with the goal of spreading the conservative. In this white paper, along with many others, they lay out very specific courses of action with the intent of converting government from a representative institution by and for the people into a tool for conservative control and propaganda:
For the new President [Bush], succumbing to temptations to rely on the career civil service to begin implementing his political and policy agenda would be a profound mistake. Career civil servants should not be tasked with formulating and executing the details of an agenda for major policy change. Political appointees, personally loyal to the President and fully committed to his policy agenda, are essential to his success, especially in the crucial early months of his Presidency. No President can or will advance his agenda alone or with a small handful of staffers in the White House or the federal departments. The President needs a full cadre of personnel committed to him and his agenda in the federal agencies that execute the details of national policy.
While this theme of replacing civil servants with people loyal to the President runs throughout this treatise, to be fair, it also discusses quite significantly the necessity for accountability at all levels of government–a vital concept Bush has completely ignored. Whether it’s giving CIA Director George Tennent a medal for his role in at worst corrupting evidence for support of the Iraq war or at best gross negligence, or promising the prosecution and then the firing of anyone in the White House involved in the outing of CIA Agent Plame and then doing nothing about Carl Rove and even commuting the sentence of “Scooter” Libby, or telling FEMA director Brown he’s doing “a heck of a job” during the utter failure that was Katrina relief and recovery, we can see Bush has no awareness of this idea of accountability. We can only hope that the next conservative President, and there of course will be one, will pay close attention to the Heritage Foundations advice to enforce accountability and responsibility across the board.
The findings of the Heritage Foundation, and yesterday’s post regarding the major media news outlets and their corporate-controlled lack of investigative or truthful journalism and the willingness of the American public to accept it, was in mind when I came upon an article by philosopher and political activist Noam Chomsky wrote back in the 80’s, before either of the Iraq wars, where he discusses how the American government, being a “democracy,” finds it necessary to control how people think instead of fascist states that are happy with just controlling what people do:
♦ Propaganda, American-style
If the U.S. were a totalitarian state, the Ministry of Truth would simply have said, “It’s right for us to go into Vietnam. Don’t argue with it.” People would have recognized that as the propaganda system, and they would have gone on thinking whatever they wanted. They would have plainly seen that we were attacking Vietnam, just as we can see the Soviets are attacking Afghanistan.
.
People are much freer in the U.S., they are allowed to express themselves. That’s why it’s necessary for those in power to control everyone’s thought, to try and make it appear as if the only issues in matters such as U.S. intervention in Vietnam are tactical: Can we get away with it? There is no discussion of right or wrong.
It’s a slightly rambling article, but it’s well worth the read. Chomsky really hits the nail on the head with his indictment of how the government, in its inherent need to maintain power and control, must find the most subtle and efficient and effective methods of controlling the way the citizens of a “free” democracy think and believe. Of course then you have the Bush administration which revels in using both thought-control as well as the bludgeon.
“In my line of work you gotta keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kinda catapult the propaganda.†- George W. Bush: May 24, 2005
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.†- Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels